Cases 21 - 30 of 71
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv11940
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MANUEL v. U.S. ARMY et al
as 2:2017cv05465
Plaintiff:
GARY E. MANUEL
Defendant:
U.S. ARMY, THE STATE COLORADO, THE STATE MAINE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv05302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
SCHMULLING v. ADP CORPORATION et al
as 2:2017cv05049
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE SCHMULLING
Defendant:
ADP CORPORATION and ADP FORT WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
FRANCIS v. NEW YORK STATE et al
as 2:2017cv05852
Plaintiff:
EVERSON FRANCIS
Defendant:
NEW YORK STATE, NEW JERSEY STATE, PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK & NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pennsylvania International Aca v. Fort Leboeuf School District
as 17-1762
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PENNSYLVANIA INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
FORT LEBOEUF SCHOOL DISTRICT
Pennsylvania International Aca v. Fort Leboeuf School District
as 17-1715
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY LLC
Defendant - Appellant:
FORT LEBOEUF SCHOOL DISTRICT
PENNSYLVANIA INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY, LLC v. FORT LEBOEUF SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 1:2016cv00251
Plaintiff:
PENNSYLVANIA INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY, LLC
Defendant:
FORT LEBOEUF SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BEDDINI v. FORTY FORT BOROUGH CODE ENFORCEMENT et al
as 3:2016cv00983
Plaintiff:
JANET LINDA BEDDINI
Defendant:
FORTY FORT BOROUGH CODE ENFORCEMENT, JOSEPH S. TOCYDLOWSKI, JR., Melissa C. Diana and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00600
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
