Cases 21 - 30 of 52
Hoover v. Parekh et al
as 1:2018cv01027
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Hoover
Defendant:
Nairaj Parekh, Comfort Inn and Sinrgi Hospitality Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hoover v. Parekh et al
as 1:2018cv01026
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Hoover
Defendant:
Nairaj Parekh, Angela Fuhrman, Comfort Inn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roe v. The Pennsylvania Game Commission et al
as 1:2017cv00186
Plaintiff:
Carl Roe
Defendant:
The Pennsylvania Game Commission , Bradley C. Bechtel , Robert W. Schlemmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kovarik et al v. South Annville Township et al
as 1:2017cv00097
Plaintiff:
Jaromir Kovarik and Daria Kovarikova
Defendant:
South Annville Township , South Annville Township, Lebanon County Authority , Donald H. Umberger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. Springettsbury Township et al
as 1:2016cv01977
Plaintiff:
Labre Lopez
Defendant:
Springettsbury Township , Russell Schauer , York County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HART v. WEST MIFFLIN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2016cv01066
Plaintiff:
MARK HART
Defendant:
WEST MIFFLIN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT, DR. DANIEL CASTAGNA, DR. MARK HOOVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roe v. The Pennsylvania Game Commission et al
as 1:2016cv00089
Plaintiff:
Carl Roe
Defendant:
The Pennsylvania Game Commission, Bradley C. Bechtel, Robert W. Schlemmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Korth v. Estate of Mark Botts et al
as 1:2015cv02422
Plaintiff:
Gary L. Korth
Defendant:
Estate of Mark Botts, Oliver Township Police Dept. , Joseph R. Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEE v. BARKLEY et al
as 2:2015cv05879
Plaintiff:
EDWARD LEE
Defendant:
KIMBERLY A. BARKLEY, KATHLEEN ZWIERZYNA, TARA HOOVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
