Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv03289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith & Morris Holdings, LLC et al v. Smith et al
as 3:2014cv00803
Plaintiff:
Smith & Morris Holdings, LLC , Michael C. Morris and Stephen G. Smith
Defendant:
Scott J. Smith , F. J. Monaghan , James L. Brennan, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conklin v. Kane et al
as 1:2013cv02618
Plaintiff:
Stephen G. Conklin
Defendant:
Yvette Kane, Peter J. Smith, Mark E. Morrison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00576
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-3909
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Thompson v. Behe et al
as 1:2012cv00539
Plaintiff:
Henry Thompson
Defendant:
William A. Behe, Christopher C. Conner, William A Fetterhoff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Breslin et al v. Dickison Township et al
as 1:2012cv00360
Plaintiff:
Charles B. Breslin , Paul J. Cunningham and Phillip E. Thompson
Defendant:
Dickison Township , Raymond Jones , Daniel Wyrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Knauss v. US Dept of Justice
as 12-1082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH RONALD KNAUSS
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT HENDERSCHEDT, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, US MARSHAL SER and others
Joseph Knauss v. US Dept of Justice
as 12-1081
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH RONALD KNAUSS
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT HENDERSCHEDT, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, US MARSHAL SER and others
VALERO v. SMITH et al
as 2:2011cv05710
Plaintiff:
JANNETH VALERO
Defendant:
J. SMITH, P. PETELICKI and THE NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
