Cases 21 - 29 of 29
DRADA et al v. BOROUGH OF ROSELLE et al
as 2:2015cv08052
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH DRADA and DAVID VEGA
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF ROSELLE, ROSELLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER WILLIAM LORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mary Boardman v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 14-4629
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARY BOARDMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, BROWNS SUPER STORE INC, DBA Shoprite of Oregon Avenue, OFFICER JAMES ARENTZEN, Badge No. 4681 and others
EISENBERG et al v. FORT LEE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2013cv01011
Plaintiff:
LIAM EISENBERG , MARTIN EISENBERG and NANCY DOUGHERTY
Defendant:
FORT LEE POLICE DEPARTMENT, BOROUGH OF FORT LEE, CHIEF OF POLICE THOMAS O. RIPOLI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
RIOS v. CITY OF BAYONNE et al
as 2:2012cv04716
Plaintiff:
JASON RIOS
Defendant:
CITY OF BAYONNE, BAYONNE POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHIEF ROBERT KUBERT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PANARELLO et al v. CITY OF VINELAND et al
as 1:2012cv04165
Plaintiff:
JOHN PANARELLO and SHERI PANARELLO
Defendant:
CITY OF VINELAND, TIMOTHY CODISPOTI, OFFICER ADAM SHAW and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
TUBB v. OFFICER JAMES MASOTTA
as 2:2009cv01525
Plaintiff:
MARY E. TUBB
Defendant:
OFFICER JAMES MASOTTA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
DIXON v. CITY OF PATERSON et al
as 2:2008cv04835
Plaintiff:
TONY DIXON
Defendant:
CITY OF PATERSON, CITY OF PATERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT, COUNTY OF PASSAIC and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ISLAM v. CITY OF BRIDGETON et al
as 1:2008cv01844
Plaintiff:
PAMELA WINDROW ISLAM
Defendant:
CITY OF BRIDGETON, POLICE OFFICER JAMES SHRADER, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
