Cases 21 - 30 of 874
ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION et al v. PRECISELY HOLDINGS, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv04571
Plaintiff:
ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION, JANE DOE-1, JANE DOE-2 and others
Defendant:
PRECISELY HOLDINGS, LLC, PRECISELY SOFTWARE INC., PRECISELY SOFTWARE LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
TAYLOR v. CHILDREN AND YOUTH et al
as 5:2024cv01411
Plaintiff:
KATHY L. TAYLOR
Defendant:
CHILDREN AND YOUTH, DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, BETHLEHEM POLICE DEPT. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Andy Kim, et al v. Christine Hanlon, et al
as 24-1601
Plaintiff:
ANDY KIM, in his personal capacity as a candidate for U.S. Senate, ANDY KIM FOR NEW JERSEY, SARAH SCHOENGOOD and others
Defendant:
CHRISTINE G. HANLON, in hr official capacity as Monmouth County Clerk, SCOTT M. COLABELLA, in his official capacity as Ocean County Clerk, PAULA SOLLAMI COVELLO, in her official capacity as Mercer County Clerk and others
Intervenor:
CAMDEN COUNTY DEMOCRATIC COMMITTEE
ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION et al v. ATDATA, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv04447
Plaintiff:
ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION, JANE DOE-1, JANE DOE-2 and others
Defendant:
ATDATA, LLC, RICHARD ROES 1-10 and ABC COMPANIES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
- TRANSFERRED TO CAMDEN NEW CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:24-cv-04447
as 2:2024cv04447
Plaintiff:
ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION, JANE DOE-1, JANE DOE-2 and others
Defendant:
ATDATA, LLC, RICHARD ROES 1-10 and ABC COMPANIES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Andy Kim, et al v. Christine Hanlon, et al
as 24-1602
Plaintiff:
ANDY KIM, in his personal capacity as a candidate for U.S. Senate, ANDY KIM FOR NEW JERSEY, SARAH SCHOENGOOD and others
Defendant:
CHRISTINE G. HANLON, in her official capacity as Monmouth County Clerk, SCOTT M. COLABELLA, in his official capacity as Ocean County Clerk, PAULA SOLLAMI COVELLO, in her official capacity as Mercer County Clerk and others
Intervenor:
CAMDEN COUNTY DEMOCRATIC COMMITTEE
Andy Kim, et al v. Christine Hanlon, et al
as 24-1593
Plaintiff:
ANDY KIM, in his personal capacity as a candidate for U.S. Senate, ANDY KIM FOR NEW JERSEY, SARAH SCHOENGOOD and others
Defendant:
CHRISTINE G. HANLON, in her official capacity as Monmouth County Clerk, SCOTT M. COLABELLA, in his official capacity as Ocean County Clerk, PAULA SOLLAMI COVELLO, in her official capacity as Mercer County Clerk and others
Intervenor:
CAMDEN COUNTY DEMOCRATIC COMMITTEE
Amicus Curiae:
MORRIS COUNTY REPUBLICAN COMMITTEE, LAURA ALI, the New Jersey Republican Chairs Association and JOSE ARANGO
Andy Kim, et al v. Christine Hanlon, et al
as 24-1594
Plaintiff:
ANDY KIM, in his personal capacity as a candidate for U.S. Senate, ANDY KIM FOR NEW JERSEY, SARAH SCHOENGOOD and others
Defendant:
SCOTT M. COLABELLA, in his official capacity as Ocean County Clerk, PAULA SOLLAMI COVELLO, in her official capacity as Mercer County Clerk, MARY H. MELFI, in her capacity as Hunterdon County Clerk and others
Intervenor:
CAMDEN COUNTY DEMOCRATIC COMMITTEE
Appellant:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY DEMOCRATIC ORGANIZATION, LAURA ALI, NEW JERSEY REPUBLICAN CHAIRS ASSOCIATION and others
Amicus Curiae:
FULOP FOR GOVERNOR, ELECTION LAW CLINIC AT HARVARD LAW SCHOOL, LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NEW JERSEY and others
ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION et al v. WILAND, INC., et al
as 1:2024cv04442
Plaintiff:
ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION, JANE DOE-1, JANE DOE-2 and others
Defendant:
WILAND, INC.,, RICHARD ROES 1-10 and ABC COMPANIES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
- TRANSFERRED TO CAMDEN NEW CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:24-04442
as 3:2024cv04442
Plaintiff:
ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION, JANE DOE-1, A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, JANE DOE-2, A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER and others
Defendant:
WILAND, INC.,, RICHARD ROES 1-10, FICTITIOUS NAMES OF UNKNOWN INDIVIDUALS, ABC COMPANIES 1-10, FICTITIOUS NAMES OF UNKNOWN ENTITIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
