Cases 21 - 30 of 119
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv20108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al v. DeJOY et al
as 2:2020cv04096
Plaintiff:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MAINE and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, LOUIS DeJOY and ROBERT M. DUNCAN
Amicus Curiae:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MARCH FOR OUR LIVES ACTION FUND, TEAM ENOUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409
JOHNAKIN v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 2:2020cv04055
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, LOUIS DeJOY and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Plaintiff:
MELVIN JOHNAKIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HOLZMANN v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 2:2019cv21779
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HOLZMANN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GASPAROVIC v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 1:2019cv21594
Plaintiff:
FRANK GASPAROVIC
Defendant:
BRANCH OF POST OFFICE and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv05885
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
MBU v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 2:2019cv21082
Defendant:
SUPERVISOR PERSON, EMPLOYED MEMBER #1, MRS. JOI and others
Plaintiff:
JERSIE MBU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ORTEGA et al v. WILMER-SANDERS et al
as 1:2019cv19285
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA DURAN and JESUS ORTEGA
Defendant:
PATRICIA WILMER-SANDERS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01005
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
FRY v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 5:2019cv02139
Plaintiff:
ERICCA FRY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, DANIEL SHAUB, CHRISTINE GOODY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
