Cases 31 - 40 of 426
SCHOEMAN et al v. OFFICE OF ATTORNEY ETHICS et al
as 3:2022cv06685
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN FRANCIS SCHOEMAN and JOANNE LOUISE SCHOEMAN
Defendant:
OFFICE OF ATTORNEY ETHICS and COURT AND JUDICIAL SECURITY UNIT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perfilio v. Tonti et al
as 3:2022cv01766
Plaintiff:
Francis J. Perfilio
Defendant:
Jerome Tonti and William Tonti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2900
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
LITTLE v. TOWNSHIP OF IRVINGTON et al
as 2:2022cv06077
Plaintiff:
TANISHA LITTLE
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF IRVINGTON, TRACY BOWERS, MAURICE GATTISON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
LITTLE v. TOWNSHIP OF IRVINGTON et al
as 2:2022cv06078
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF IRVINGTON, TRACY BOWERS, MAURICE GATTISON and others
4Th Party Plaintiff:
TANISHA LITTLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv05368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
FASSETT v. POPE FRANCIS OF VATICAN et al
as 1:2022cv00162
Plaintiff:
MAURICE FASSETT
Defendant:
POPE FRANCIS OF VATICAN and PRESIDENT OF DC WHITE HOUSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Francis Stock v. Chanelle Braswell, et al
as 22-1951
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANCIS STOCK
Defendant / Appellee:
CHANELLE BRASWELL, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS AN AGENT OF THE PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00625
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
