Cases 31 - 40 of 40
HAHN v. THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE et al
as 2:2011cv06369
Plaintiff:
PHILIP E. HAHN
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADEGBITE v. MURDOCH et al
as 2:2011cv00492
Plaintiff:
VANESSA ADEGBITE
Defendant:
RUPERT MURDOCH, NEW YORK POST, NEWS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv03424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HIGGINS v. MOSS et al
as 2:2010cv03023
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH W. HIGGINS
Defendant:
HASAN SANDER, SHIRL SMITH, STEPHEN J. BERSTEIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LANG et al v. TEWKSBURY TOWNSHIP et al
as 3:2010cv02564
Plaintiff:
NILES LANG and SONJA KEITH
Defendant:
TEWKSBURY TOWNSHIP , TEWKSBURY TOWNSHIP ENGINEER , CHARLES ROGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Susan Cameron-Honaker, et al v. Dee Arpino, et al
as 09-4287
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUSAN CAMERON-HONAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
ELEANA MEYERS, MEYERS CRIME FAMILY, Jane Does, et al., GILL and others
Defendant:
DEE ARPINO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv03052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Cameron-Honaker et al v. Arpino et al
as 1:2009cv00442
Plaintiff:
Susan Cameron-Honaker and John Cameron-Honaker & Family
Defendant:
Dee Arpino, Eleana Meyers, Meyers Crime Family and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
SMART v. TOWNSHIP OF BERLIN et al
as 1:2007cv06103
Plaintiff:
SALAHUDDIN F. SMART
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF BERLIN, MICHAEL HAYDEN, STEEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
