Cases 31 - 40 of 43
BUCKSHAW v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 2:2020cv05965
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. BUCKSHAW
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUCKSHAW v. MCDONALD'S HAMBURGERS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2020cv05947
Defendant:
MCDONALD'S HAMBURGERS CORPORATION, FAIRFAX COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER AND ATTORNEY GENERAL - CONSUMER PROTECTION, FAIRFAX COUNTY POLICE AND SHERIFF and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. BUCKSHAW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUCKSHAW v. SUPREME COURT AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2018cv01156
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, COMMUNITY RELATIONS SERVICE and SUPREME COURT AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. BUCKSHAW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BUCKSHAW v. RICCIARDI et al
as 2:2018cv01157
Defendant:
GENE RICCIARDI, ALAN F. PELTON and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. BUCKSHAW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BUCKSHAW v. QUAL LYNX CLAIMS ADJUSTERS et al
as 1:2017cv08446
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. BUCKSHAW
Defendant:
QUAL LYNX CLAIMS ADJUSTERS, GREYHOUND BUS, ANTHONY SWAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUCKSHAW v. QUAL LYNX CLAIMS ADJUSTERS et al
as 1:2017cv08448
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. BUCKSHAW
Defendant:
QUAL LYNX CLAIMS ADJUSTERS, CCMSI CLAIMS ADJUSTERS, GREYHOUND BUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUCKSHAW v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 1:2017cv08452
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. BUCKSHAW
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUCKSHAW v. BALLY HOTEL AND CASINO et al
as 1:2017cv08451
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. BUCKSHAW
Defendant:
BALLY HOTEL AND CASINO, QUAL-LYNX CLAIMS ADJUSTER, TANGER OUTLETS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Buckshaw v. Fitness International
as 14-2716
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN J. BUCKSHAW
Defendant:
FITNESS INTERNATIONAL, Trading as LA FITNESS
BUCKSHAW v. FITNESS INTERNATIONAL
as 2:2014cv02407
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. BUCKSHAW
Defendant:
FITNESS INTERNATIONAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
