Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Craig Campbell v. City of New Kensington, et al
as 11-1105
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG CAMPBELL
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF NEW KENSINGTON, DONALD E. BOWERS, City Councilman, MICHAEL J. LANGER, City Councilman and others
Craig Campbell v. City of New Kensington, et al
as 11-1105
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CRAIG CAMPBELL
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF NEW KENSINGTON, DONALD E. BOWERS, City Councilman, MICHAEL J. LANGER, City Councilman and others
VURIMINDI v. FUQUA SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
as 2:2010cv00234
Plaintiff:
VAMSIDHAR R. VURIMINDI
Defendant:
FUQUA SCHOOL OF BUSINESS, MOIRA RINGO, DOUGLAS M. BASHAR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Aktham Abuhouran v. Fletcher Allen Health Care Inc, et al
as 09-3073
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AKTHAM ABUHOURAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CORR HEALTH SER INC, PUB DEFENDER NJ, PETER M. CARTER, Esq. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
JOHNSON et al v. GLOBAL TEL*LINK
as 2:2008cv06056
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY R. JOHNSON and HIXCY COTHRAN
Defendant:
GLOBAL TEL*LINK
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv01117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
ABUHOURAN v. FLETCHER ALLEN HEALTH CARE INC. et al
as 2:2007cv05108
Plaintiff:
AKTHAM ABUHOURAN
Defendant:
FLETCHER ALLEN HEALTH CARE INC., UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT, MICAHEL A. HORGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
