Cases 31 - 40 of 301
Bozeman et al v. Johnson et al
as 1:2022cv01079
Plaintiff:
Rose Bozeman and Samiah Ortiz
Defendant:
Chief Thomas A. Johnson, City of Dover and John Doe Officers A & B
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
James Rose, Jr. v. Coleen Christian, et al
as 22-2290
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES E. ROSE, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
COLEEN CHRISTIAN, COUNTY OF BUCKS and BUCKS COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
WOODS v. MURPHY
as 3:2022cv04284
Plaintiff:
ROSE WOODS
Defendant:
PHILIP MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
STAPLES v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2022cv02118
Plaintiff:
MYISHA STAPLES
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CORIZON HEALTH, INC., CITY OF PHILADELPHIA CURRAN-FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02725
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Vought v. Tonkin et al
as 3:2022cv00506
Plaintiff:
Erica Rose Vought
Defendant:
Ray Tonkin, Esquire Bruce DeSarro, Gregory H. Chelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MARCHISOTTO v. DALEY et al
as 3:2022cv01276
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. MARCHISOTTO
Defendant:
ROGER W. DALEY, SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION, SUPERIOR COURT TRUST FUND UNIT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James Rose, Jr. v. WalMart Corp
as 22-1316
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES E. ROSE, JR.
Defendant:
WALMART CORP
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
