Cases 41 - 50 of 64
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv06779
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
KNAPP et al v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2010cv01429
Plaintiff:
ROBERT C. KNAPP and DIANE S. KNAPP
Defendant:
DOUGLAS ADAMS, KIM CLEMENTS, MICHELLE POLING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coss v. Jordan et al
as 3:2010cv01479
Plaintiff:
Edward Coss
Defendant:
William Jordan, Gene Ruddy, Officer Kapac and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Ross, et al v. Township of Woodbridge, et al
as 10-2074
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICHAEL E. ROSS and RAESHEENA ROSS
Defendant - Appellee:
TOWNSHIP OF WOODBRIDGE, MIDDLESEX CTY, WOODBRIDGE POL DEPT and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRIS LYONS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv01542
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv05664
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
KLEINBERG v. CLEMENTS et al
as 1:2009cv04924
Plaintiff:
JOHN KLEINBERG
Defendant:
ALBERT CLEMENTS, EDMOND SHIELDS, MICHAEL KERNAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
CLEMENTS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA et al
as 2:2009cv03527
Plaintiff:
GREGORY CLEMENTS
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA and COMMON PLEAS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Democracy Rising PA, et al v. John Celluci, et al
as 09-2170
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMOCRACY RISING PA and TIM POTTS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN CELLUCI, CHARLES A. CLEMENT, CHARLES CUNNINGHAM and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
