Cases 41 - 50 of 109
TRAPP v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2018cv14432
Defendant:
KATHRYN M. GILBERTSON SHABEL, THE LAW FIRM PARKER MCCAY, GEORGE CRETELLA and others
Plaintiff:
DENARD C. TRAPP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOWARD v. CHESTER COUNTY OFFICE OF JUVENILE PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
as 2:2018cv03997
Defendant:
MELISSA CREEDAN, PLATT, DIGIORGIO, DIFABIO, LAW FIRM, OFFICER KEVIN PRICE and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL HOWARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRETT v. SAMSON, et als
as 2:2018cv12908
Defendant:
WOLF AND SAMSON, JOE ANDEE BANU, JOHN MORGAN and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRETT v. SAMSON, et als
as 3:2018cv12908
Defendant:
WOLF AND SAMSON, JOE ANDEE BANU, JOHN MORGAN and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kush v. Bayview Loan Servicing et al
as 3:2018cv01483
Defendant:
Bayview Loan Servicing, WB General Hospital Commonwealth Health Union, The Court of Common Pleas of Luzerne County, Pennsylvania and others
Plaintiff:
Amy Kush
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GILLESPIE v. NEWARK PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2018cv10659
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE GILLESPIE
Defendant:
NEWARK PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT, CHRISTOPHER CERF, MARION BOLDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COPELAND v. US BANK et al
as 1:2018cv00019
Plaintiff:
MARCIA COPELAND
Defendant:
US BANK , LAW FIRM OF GARY GEITZ, LLC. , CITY OF CAMDEN TAX OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JOHNSON v. JOHN F. MIZNER LAW FIRM
as 2:2017cv01487
Plaintiff:
R. WAYNE JOHNSON
Defendant:
JOHN F. MIZNER LAW FIRM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv09238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Joan Preston v. Vanguard Investment Firm, et al
as 17-2591
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOAN P. PRESTON
Defendant - Appellee:
VANGUARD INVESTMENT FIRM, DAVID KOLLER, GERALD J. PAPPERT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
