Cases 51 - 60 of 1,534
Urve Maggitti v. William Mahon, et al
as 23-3275
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
WILLIAM P. MAHON, JOHN HALL, DEBRA TODD and others
Urve Maggitti v. Bret Binder, et al
as 23-3277
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
BRET M. BINDER, DEBRA RYAN, DANIEL E. ROLAND and others
DANIELS v. CAPITAL HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER et al
as 3:2023cv23425
Plaintiff:
SHANITA DANIELS
Defendant:
CAPITAL HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER and CAPITAL HEALTH PRIMARY CARE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MAGGITTI v. PULLANO et al
as 2:2023cv05141
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
MICHAEL PULLANO, JOSEPH F KAMPHERSTEIN III, CLAIRE REEVES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Burton v. Craig et al
as 2:2023cv05020
Plaintiff:
DERRICK BURTON
Defendant:
Detective Daniel Craig, SPRINGFIELD TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT and SPRINGFIELD TOWNSHIP POLICE DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04782
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Elad v. Truist Bank et al
as 1:2023cv01360
Plaintiff:
Joseph B. Elad
Defendant:
Truist Bank, Joshua Collins, Ballard Spahr LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Andrew Fullman v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 23-3073
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW FULLMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, POLICE COMMISSIONER DANIELLE M. OUTLAW, CHARLES KING, Detective, #9008 and others
Kerr v. Morgan et al
as 1:2023cv01926
Plaintiff:
John M. Kerr
Defendant:
Kathryn Peifer Morgan, Esq., Barbara E. Griffin, Esq., George P. Hartwick, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
