Cases 51 - 60 of 60
JOHNS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2008cv05314
Plaintiff:
TERRELL JOHNS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JAMES PITTS, KEVIN JUDGE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv05071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
HICKSON v. HARRAH'S HOTEL AND CASINO et al
as 1:2008cv02407
Plaintiff:
EARL D. HICKSON
Defendant:
HARRAH'S HOTEL AND CASINO, ALEXANDER, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv02267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Huertas v. City of Camden, et al
as 08-2042
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HECTOR L. HUERTAS
Defendant - Appellee:
7 ELEVEN INC, 75-1085131 (FEIN)
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN, MELVIN R. PRIMAS, City of Camden C.E.O., GWENDOLYN FAISON, Mayor and others
OELSCHLAGER v. MORTON'S OF CHICAGO INC.
as 2:2008cv01311
Plaintiff:
RICHARD OELSCHLAGER
Defendant:
MORTON'S OF CHICAGO INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LITTLE v. CITY AND COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2007cv05361
Plaintiff:
OMAR SHARIF LITTLE
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA, MORTON and MICHAEL GROSS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MCCOULLUM v. KRZYWICKI et al
as 2:2007cv04495
Plaintiff:
CHARMAINE PRATER-COLON MCCOULLUM
Defendant:
KRZYWICKI, CITY OF PHILA POLICE DEPT., SYLVESTER JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00657
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
