Cases 61 - 70 of 146
Wilnick Dorval v. Sapphire Village Condominium A, et al
as 16-3601
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILNICK DORVAL
Defendant - Appellee:
SAPPHIRE VILLAGE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, JAQUELINE LINDBERG, BERNARD M. VANSLUYTMAN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv04507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
BUSH v. THE CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2016cv00926
Plaintiff:
ANTWAUN BUSH
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PITTSBURGH, CITY OF PITTSBURGH BUREAU OF POLICE, NATHAN HARPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JENKINS v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2016cv00845
Plaintiff:
JENKINS and JEFFREY JENKINS
Defendant:
WILLIAMS, TONIA WILLIAMS, ROBERT HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01877
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Advantage Point v. Borough of Kutztown, et al
as 16-1892
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ADVANTAGE POINT, LP
Defendant - Appellee:
BOROUGH OF KUTZTOWN, SSM GROUP INC, DARYL A. JENKINS and others
Debtor - Appellant:
TIMOTHY G. DIETRICH
Defendant - Appellant:
KEITH MOONEY, JEFFREY D. LOBACH, GEORGE C. WERNER, JR. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv05663
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
JENKINS v. WEICHERT FINANCIAL SERVICES et al
as 2:2015cv07440
Plaintiff:
KEVIN K. JENKINS
Defendant:
WEICHERT FINANCIAL SERVICES, HANNA'S DELI/WATERSIDE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
