Cases 61 - 70 of 1,086
Teo Johnson, et al v. City of Clifton, et al
as 23-2550
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TEO JOHNSON, TEO T. POWELL and ZENA L. POWELL, a/k/a The Johnson-Powell Group, LLC.
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CLIFTON, CLIFTON POLICE DEPARTMENT and THE CITY OF CLIFTON ABC LICENSING BOARD
COX et al v. LANCASTER TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2023cv01548
Plaintiff:
DAVID N. COX, II, HEATHER K. COX and COXS AG SERVICES, LLC
Defendant:
LANCASTER TOWNSHIP, MICHAEL CORNELL, CHRISTOPHER ALTMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2491
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Russell Scott Walker v. State of Delaware, et al
as 23-2513
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUSSELL E. SCOTT WALKER
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF DELAWARE, CITY OF MILFORD, MILFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Markale-Alsamod Sowell v. Altoona Police Department, et al
as 23-2407
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARKALE-ALSAMOD SOWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
ALTOONA POLICE DEPARTMENT, PETER J. WEEKS, District Attorney, CIRO, K-9 Officer and others
CERIGO et al v. MCKENNA et al
as 2:2023cv04311
Plaintiff:
THEO CERIGO and NANCY SMITH
Defendant:
CASSEY MCKENNA, GABRIEL MOREANO, EUGENE LUGTU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2423
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Meeks v. DOE et al
as 4:2023cv01240
Plaintiff:
Frisco Meeks
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, Daniel Golden, Lauren Colom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Lewis v. John Fietkiewicz, et al
as 23-2240
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN M. FIETKIEWICZ, HOLLY K. KULKA, JOHN GAY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
