Cases 61 - 70 of 85
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
SABATINO v. UNION TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2011cv01656
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR SABATINO
Defendant:
UNION COUNTY, UNION COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, UNION COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Cross_claimant:
DAN ZEISER
Cross_defendant:
DAN ZEISER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv06894
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01535
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
ORTIZ v. SCHMIDT et al
as 2:2010cv05140
Plaintiff:
HENRY ORTIZ
Defendant:
REGINA SCHMIDT and MARGARTET A. SCHMIDT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berne Corp, et al v. Gov VI, et al
as 10-2864
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BERNE CORP, TWENTY-ONE QUEEN QUARTER, INC., CYRIL V FRANCOIS and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MILLER PROP, B&B AUTO BODY SHOP, EQUIVEST ST. THOMAS INC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GOV VI and BERNADETTE WILLIAMS, in her official capacity as Tax Assessor, and the Board of Tax Review
CREDICO v. OBAMA et al
as 2:2010cv03456
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN MICHAEL CREDICO
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER, MICHAEL BERNARD MUKASEY, ROBERT MUELLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael Schmidt v. James Creedon, et al
as 10-1633
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL C. SCHMIDT
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES P. CREEDON, CONNIE A. TENNIS, RICHARD S. SHAFFER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00481
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv03008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
