Cases 71 - 80 of 135
FUNG et al v. SAVASTANO et al
as 2:2015cv06493
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY C. FUNG and PATRICIA WHITNEY
Defendant:
ANTHONY SAVASTANO, TEANECK SHELL GAS STATION AT 209 CEDAR LANE, TEANECK SHELL INC. and others
Interested Party:
BERGEN COUNTY PROSECUTOR and BERGEN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SANCHEZ v. RYER
as 2:2015cv05678
Plaintiff:
RANDY SANCHEZ
Defendant:
EDWARD F. RYER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MARIA GUADALUPE SANCHEZ JIMENEZ v. SECOND HOTEL AT NEWPORT, LLC. et al
as 2:2015cv01758
Plaintiff:
MARIA GUADALUPE SANCHEZ JIMENEZ
Defendant:
SECOND HOTEL AT NEWPORT, LLC. , STARWOOD HOTELS AND RESORTS WORLDWIDE, INC. , KENNETH HICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
BERDECIA et al v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY et al
as 2:2015cv00682
Plaintiff:
MARCOS BERDECIA and DAVID BONARDI
Defendant:
CITY OF JERSEY CITY, JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, MATTHEW KILROY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Desmond Witherspoon v. Yaris Sanchez
as 14-4443
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DESMOND WITHERSPOON
Defendant:
YARIS SANCHEZ
WITHERSPOON v. SANCHEZ
as 2:2014cv06826
Plaintiff:
DESMOND WITHERSPOON
Defendant:
YARIS SANCHEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv03568
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01655
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
