Cases 71 - 80 of 408
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv13432
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KARUPAIYAN et al v. NAGANDA et al
as 2:2020cv12356
Defendant:
ARUL THIRUMURUGU, JUDGE JOSEPH YANNOTTI, JUSTICE WALTER F. TIMPONE and others
Plaintiff:
PALANI KARUPAIYAN, R.P and P.P
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HICKOX v. TICE et al
as 3:2020cv00161
Defendant:
ZACHARY MOSLAK, MELANIE PYLE, ERIC TICE and others
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN HICKOX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brett v. D'Andrea et al
as 1:2020cv01398
Defendant:
Shortly Blueh, Chrystal Brown, Barry Mighr and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
BRETT v. NEW JERSEY GOVERNOR CHRIS CHRISTIE et al
as 3:2020cv09033
Defendant:
SOLF & SOMPSON LAW FIRM, BARRY KNIGHT, PAUL JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOUGH et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv03508
Plaintiff:
CALLUM WILSON, MAHEEN SHAFI, CHRISTOPHER ROMANO and others
Defendant:
DENNIS WILSON, JANE/JOHN DOES 1-100, RICHARD NICOLETTI, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
ABUNDANT LIFE CHURCH et al v. MURPHY
as 3:2020cv06557
Plaintiff:
PASTOR SAMUEL PEREZ, GRACE REFORM CHURCH OF JERSEY CITY, GRACE BIBLE CHURCH and others
Defendant:
GOVERNOR PHIL MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SCHEUFLER v. STEFANSKI et al
as 2:2020cv06141
Defendant:
ELIZABETH II, GRUBIR S GREWAL, STEVEN T. MNUCHIN and others
Plaintiff:
KARL PETER SCHEUFLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BERNARD v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
as 2:2020cv00670
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Plaintiff:
WALTER BERNARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Vega v. Bolan, Esquire et al
as 1:2020cv00710
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Commonwealth, Michael Smith and Kayla Bolan, Esquire
Plaintiff:
Walter Vega
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
