Cases 81 - 90 of 340
GLOVER v. COHEN, DANIEL E. et al
as 2:2019cv00734
Defendant:
CREATIVE INTEGRATION & DESIGN, INC., LOWELL FRENCH, SUZANNE KAMEESE and others
Plaintiff:
MORRIS S. GLOVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02726
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv13469
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01885
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
OWUSU v. THE PRESIDENT OF THE BOARD ROBERT MORRIS UNIVERSITY et al
as 2:2019cv10772
Plaintiff:
KWAME OWUSU
Defendant:
THE PRESIDENT OF THE BOARD ROBERT MORRIS UNIVERSITY and JACQUELYN FRAAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. MORRIS COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS et al
as 2:2019cv09773
Claimant:
MORRIS COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS
Defendant:
FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION and DAVID STEKETEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORRIS COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS v. FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION et al
as 2:2019cv09776
Claimant:
MORRIS COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS
Defendant:
FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION and DAVID STEKETEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
ALLEN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv01066
Defendant:
DREW RICE, MICHAEL REPICI, JOSEPH MEARS and others
Plaintiff:
BAKEER ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SLOMOVITZ et al v. THE ENCLAVE AT FAIRWAYS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.
as 3:2018cv16910
Plaintiff:
MORRIS WALDMAN, NATHAN FRANKEL, SAMUEL LANDY and others
Defendant:
THE ENCLAVE AT FAIRWAYS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv15670
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
