Cases 1 - 10 of 17
SAVAGE v. BI-PETRO, INC.
as 2:2023cv00694
Plaintiff:
SULAIMAN SAVAGE
Defendant:
BI-PETRO, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
WILEY v. UNION POLICE OFFICER "PETRO" et al
as 2:2022cv00999
Plaintiff:
DANA W. WILEY
Defendant:
UNION POLICE OFFICER "PETRO", STATE FARRELL PAROLE AGENT "TIM MCGRAW", UNION POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv12259
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00615
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Newark Cab Association, et al v. City of Newark
as 17-1358
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NEWARK CAB ASSOCIATION, NEWARK TAXI OWNER ASSOCIATION, TETERBORO AIRPORT LIMOUSINE SERVICE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF NEWARK
NEWARK CAB ASSOCIATION et al v. CITY OF NEWARK
as 2:2016cv04681
Plaintiff:
NEWARK CAB ASSOCIATION , NEWARK TAXI OWNER ASSOCIATION , TETERBORO AIRPORT LIMOUSINE SERVICE and others
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWARK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-1055
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02908
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WAGNER v. BRITTEN et al
as 2:2015cv02272
Plaintiff:
JACONDA WAGNER
Defendant:
THOMAS BRITTEN, JR., THOMAS BRITTEN, SR., JACQUELINE ALLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHIELD OF FAITH EMBASSY INTERNATIONAL MISSIONS v. DEACON et al
as 2:2015cv01105
Plaintiff:
SHIELD OF FAITH EMBASSY INTERNATIONAL MISSIONS
Defendant:
RODGER DEACON, THOMAS M. PETRO, DAN CAPARO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
