Cases 1 - 10 of 1,570
Marianne Sawicki v. Michael Kipphan, et al
as 24-2033
Plaintiff:
MARIANNE SAWICKI
Defendant:
MICHAEL M. KIPPHAN, LORI HEATON, RICHARD A. WILSON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00811
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-2007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
SMITH v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT AGENCY et al
as 3:2024cv06657
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SMITH
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT AGENCY and VONDALYN MCKEITHEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00865
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
TALBERT v. IRWIN et al
as 2:2024cv00675
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
RANDY IRWIN, JOHN BLICHA, IAN GUSTAFSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
West-Bogans v. Guido et al
as 1:2024cv00717
Plaintiff:
Angela West-Bogans and Angela West
Defendant:
Judge Edward Guido, Judge Claudia Brewbaker, Judge Albert Masland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PARSONS v. COUNTY OF ESSEX et al
as 2:2024cv05615
Plaintiff:
DEVIN PARSONS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ESSEX, ESSEX COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and CORRECTION OFFICER MELISSA SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SAALIH v. PITTSBURGH POLICE et al
as 2:2024cv00626
Plaintiff:
ABDUL HAKEEM SAALIH
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH POLICE, ALLEGHENY COUNTY DA'S OFFICE, PITTSBURGH POLICE REVIEW BOARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VERGARA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv05555
Defendant:
REGINA INEZ PEOPLES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Plaintiff:
LUIS EDUARDO VERGARA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
