Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
CASTON v. CITY OF NEW YORK POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2021cv03827
Plaintiff:
CHARLES CASTON
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK POLICE DEPARTMENT, STEPHEN SCHWARZMAN, JONATHAN GRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORTON-ROZIER v. GATEWAY SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2021cv00003
Defendant:
GATEWAY SCHOOL DISTRICT and PAUL CALIARI
Plaintiff:
KORIE MORTON-ROZIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv05196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
CESAR CASTILLO, INC. et al v. ACTAVIS HOLDCO U.S., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv00721
Plaintiff:
KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC., CESAR CASTILLO, INC., FWK HOLDINGS, L.L.C. and others
Defendant:
BAUSCH HEALTH AMERICAS, INC., HERITAGE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
ANDREWS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv00556
Defendant:
LAWRENCE S. KRASNER, CHRISTINE COULTER, JACQUELINE F. ALLEN and others
Plaintiff:
BAHIYA MORTON ANDREWS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv03253
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
Positano v. Superior Court of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2019cv01320
Defendant:
Judge Gary Morton, Judge Thomas James, Superior Court of Pennsylvania and others
Plaintiff:
Onofrio Positano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BENNETT v. PITTS et al
as 2:2019cv02988
Defendant:
JUDGE, JAMES PITTS, LEVI MORTON and others
Plaintiff:
HASSAN BENNETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
