Cases 1 - 10 of 24
ARMSTRONG v. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2024cv01957
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and POLK, SHEER & PROBER LAW OFFICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al
as 2:2024cv01956
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA and POLK, SHEER & PROBER LAW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2024cv01978
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, SIRLIN GALLOGLY & LESSER, PC, BARBARA A. FEIN LAW OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv16824
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv07843
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
EAKIN v. BOROUGH OF POLK et al
as 1:2020cv00039
Plaintiff:
STEVEN G. EAKIN
Defendant:
ALAN K. HELLER, BOROUGH OF POLK, EDWARD SHARP, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
STANICH et al v. PICKENS et al
as 1:2018cv00120
Plaintiff:
ROBERT STANICH , PAUL M. STANICH and DEBORAH L. CANTON
Defendant:
SHIRLEY J. PICKENS and POLK CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Department of Finance of Susse v. Clifford Polk Heirs, et al
as 18-1164
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE OF SUSSEX COUNTY, a Political Subdivision of the State of Delaware
Defendant:
CLIFFORD E. POLK HEIRS, JOANN CARROLL, EULALIA DERRICKSON and others
Not Party - Appellant:
GEORGE K. TRAMMELL, III
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-3670
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
