Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Dion Horton, et al v. Administrative Judge Jill Rangos, et al
as 24-1325
Plaintiff:
DION HORTON, DAMON JONES, CRAIG BROWNLEE and others
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE JILL RANGOS, in her official capacity, FRANK J. SCHERER, DIRECTOR OF ADULT PROBATION AND PAROLE, in his official capacity, ANTHONY M. MARIANI, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS JUDGE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
GABRIS v. GABRIS et al
as 1:2023cv02507
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. GABRIS
Defendant:
ANTHONY M. GABRIS, CHRIS GABRIS, MICHELLE GABRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
YOHANANOV v. DEVINE et al
as 2:2022cv05186
Plaintiff:
ASA YOHANANOV
Defendant:
JUDGE JAMES G. DEVINE, JUDGE ANDREW W. WUBBENHORST, ANTHONY M. ARBORE, ESQ. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anthony M. v. Tunkhannock Area School District
as 3:2021cv01648
Plaintiff:
Anthony M.
Defendant:
Tunkhannock Area School District
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
ABOLITIONIST LAW CENTER v. MARIANI
as 2:2021cv00285
Plaintiff:
ABOLITIONIST LAW CENTER
Defendant:
JUDGE ANTHONY M. MARIANI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MINGUELA v. ROMANTINO et al
as 1:2020cv01893
Defendant:
J. SCOTT THOMSON, ODISE CARR, LIEUNTENANT JOSEPH WYSOCKI and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD MINGUELA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ZELLERS v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2019cv02304
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILWAY CORPORATION, AMTRAK POLICE DEPARTMENT, SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY and others
Plaintiff:
WENDELL ZELLERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
