Cases 1 - 9 of 9
RAMAPOUGH MOUNTAIN INDIANS, INC. v. THOMAS
as 2:2021cv09649
Plaintiff:
RAMAPOUGH MOUNTAIN INDIANS, INC.
Defendant:
DANIEL B. THOMAS and DANIEL THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv07029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00439
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
State of NJ, et al v. James Brent Thomas, Sr.
as 09-1504
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF NJ, NJ STATE POL, OFC ATL CTY PROS and others
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES B. THOMAS, SR.
State of NJ v. James Thomas, Sr.
as 09-1447
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF NJ
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES B. THOMAS, SR.
Unalachtigo Band of the Nantic, et al v. Jon Corzine, et al
as 08-3716
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNALACHTIGO BAND OF THE NANTICOKE LENNI LENAPE NATION
Plaintiff:
JAMES B. THOMAS, SR., Tribal Chairman and War Chief Unalachtigo Band of the Nanticoke-Lenni Lenape Nation
Defendant:
GOV. JOHN CORZINE and STATE OF NJ
Intervenor-Defendant:
POWHATAN INDIANS OF DE VALLEY, DBA Powhatan Renape Nation and STOCKBRIDGE-MUNSEE COMM
THOMAS v. PATHMARK STORES, INC.
as 2:2008cv03411
Plaintiff:
LYNN B. THOMAS
Defendant:
PATHMARK STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Unalachtigo Band of the Nantic, et al v. Jon Corzine, et al
as 08-2775
Plaintiff:
UNALACHTIGO BAND OF THE NANTICOKE LENNI LENAPE NATION and JAMES B. THOMAS, SR., Tribal Chairman and War Chief Unalachtigo Band of the Nanticoke-Lenni Lenape Nation
Intervenor-Defendant - Intervenor-appellee:
POWHATAN INDIANS OF DE VALLEY, DBA Powhatan Renape Nation
Defendant - Appellee:
GOV. JOHN CORZINE and STATE OF NJ
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant:
STOCKBRIDGE-MUNSEE COMM
Not Party - Proposed Amicus-Appellee:
NJ LAND TITLE ASSOC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
