Cases 1 - 10 of 1,791
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
DALNOKY v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2024cv06281
Plaintiff:
PAUL B. DALNOKY
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and THE NEW JERSEY COURT SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Marchisotto v. Juan Sanchez, et al
as 24-1922
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. MARCHISOTTO
Defendant:
JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ, KENT A. JORDAN, MICHAEL A. CHAGARES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00722
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Bouazza Ouaziz v. Phil Murphy, et al
as 24-1867
Plaintiff:
BOUAZZA OUAZIZ
Defendant:
PHIL MURPHY, Governor of New Jersey - Individually and Personal Capacity, SARAH ADILMAN, Chief Executive of Department of Human Service, FRANK MEZZA, Deputy Director Department of Family Service Hudson County - Individually and Personal Capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05959
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
