Cases 1 - 10 of 112
Bennett et al v. Bannon et al
as 1:2024cv00416
Plaintiff:
Ret. Sgt. Craig T. Bennett, Francine M. Bennett, Aliyah M. Bennett and others
Defendant:
Eric J. Bannon, Kirk William Ruquet, Matthew R. Sarkissian and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
MAMROUD et al v. STOLTE et al
as 3:2023cv22615
In Re:
MAMROUD
Petitioner:
JEFFREY MAMROUD
Respondent:
MAGISTRATE BARBARA STOLTE, BRIAN ENGLISH, MATTHEW PLATKIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CLAY et al v. LOVE et al
as 3:2023cv03074
Plaintiff:
FELICIA CLAY and CHARLES BENNETT
Defendant:
STEPHEN LOVE, DAVID KELSO, CITY OF ASBURY PARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
BENNETT v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY et al
as 1:2023cv01255
Plaintiff:
COMAW BENNETT
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY and JUDGE EYNON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 ra Rehabilitation Act of 1973
LLOYD v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2022cv05148
Plaintiff:
SUSAN LLOYD
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, SARA GRAY and BENNETT BRICKLIN AND SALTZBURG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
