Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3036
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kevin Potter, et al v. David Newkirk, et al
as 23-2625
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN POTTER and MARGUERITE POTTER
Defendant:
DAVID NEWKIRK, ROBERT ROBBINS, JOSE RODRIGUEZ and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY SHERRIFS DEPARTMENT NEW JERSEY, PROSECUTOR CUMBERLAND COUNTY, JON REILLY and others
DEJESUS JR. et al v. SANTIAGO et al
as 5:2023cv03424
Plaintiff:
ANGEL L. DEJESUS JR. and CAROLINE MORALES
Defendant:
LOUIS SANTIAGO, MATTHEW KARNISH, ALEXANDER BOEHM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DEJESUS JR. et al v. SANTIAGO et al
as 2:2023cv03424
Plaintiff:
ANGEL L. DEJESUS JR. and CAROLINE MORALES
Defendant:
LOUIS SANTIAGO, MATTHEW KARNISH, ALEXANDER BOEHM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marshall v. Taylor et al
as 1:2023cv00529
Plaintiff:
Krystal Marshall
Defendant:
School Nurse Darin Taylor, School Aid Theresa Taylor, Religious Pope Bob and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Delilah El v. Tom Wolf, et al
as 22-1697
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DELILAH PASSE EL
Defendant:
TOM WOLF, MICHAEL NUTTER, JIM KENNEY and others
EL v. WOLF et al
as 2:2021cv02520
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, JIYA RABEVETSKY, GOEHRING, RUTTER, AND BOEHM and others
Plaintiff:
DELILAH PASSE EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01564
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POTTER et al v. NEWKIRK et al
as 1:2017cv08478
Plaintiff:
KEVIN POTTER and MARGUERITE POTTER
Defendant:
DAVID NEWKIRK, ROBERT ROBBINS, JOSE RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
