Cases 1 - 10 of 147
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1701
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Johnson v. Carrols Corp et al
as 3:2024cv00875
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Carrols Corp, Restaurant Brand International Inc., Burger King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00930
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Abraham Ituah v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 23-3140
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABRAHAM ITUAH
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JAMES J. ZWOLAK, BRENDAN J. PHILBIN and others
Welfel v. Wilkes Barre Police Drug Task Force et al
as 3:2023cv01958
Plaintiff:
William John Welfel
Defendant:
Wilkes Barre Police Drug Task Force, Pennsylvania State Police Vice Squad, Officer Conoboy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CARROLL v. UPPER DARBY TOWNSHIP, ET AL. et al
as 2:2023cv04376
Plaintiff:
ARTIS C. CARROLL, JR.
Defendant:
UPPER DARBY TOWNSHIP, ET AL., UPPER DARBY POLICE DEPARTMENT, LUKE MCCANN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Miller v. Thomas Nelling, et al
as 23-2788
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN RYAN MILLER
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS NELLING, THOMAS GOGGIN, JOHN O'DONNELL and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH ELIAS, TRACEY LAWS, MITCHELL ROCK and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01582
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2764
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
MILLER v. GOGGIN et al
as 2:2022cv03329
Plaintiff:
JOHN RYAN MILLER
Defendant:
THOMAS NELLING, JOSEPH ELIAS, TRACEY LAWS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
