Cases 1 - 10 of 14
TALBERT v. IRWIN et al
as 2:2024cv00675
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
RANDY IRWIN, JOHN BLICHA, IAN GUSTAFSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Meeks v. DOE et al
as 4:2023cv01240
Plaintiff:
Frisco Meeks
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, Daniel Golden, Lauren Colom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRIERSON v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2022cv00523
Plaintiff:
JAMES FRIERSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, OFFICER KEITH EDMONDS, LIEUTENANT MATT GAUNTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv20044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schaszberger et al v. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Council 13
as 3:2019cv01922
Plaintiff:
Gary Landiak, Kyle Clouse, Colby Conner and others
Defendant:
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Council 13
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Kilgarriff v. Strunk et al
as 3:2018cv10120
Plaintiff:
Cornelius James Kilgarriff, IV
Defendant:
Thomas Strunk, Mateusz Ryba, Colby Meloy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KILGARRIFF v. STRUNK et al
as 1:2018cv10120
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS J. KILGARRIFF, IV
Defendant:
THOMAS I. STRUNK, MATEUSZ RYBA, COLBY MELOY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHARDSON et al v. ORIOLO et al
as 2:2016cv00135
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY RICHARDSON and COLBY RICHARDSON
Defendant:
NICHOLAS ORIOLO, JAMEL SEMPER, 1-100 JANE AND JOHN DOES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-4623
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
MCGUIRE v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2014cv01531
Plaintiff:
SHANE MCGUIRE
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, COLBY J. NEIDIG and DAVID BLATT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
