Cases 1 - 10 of 40
DARGAN v. BLAIR COUNTY et al
as 3:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
DONALD DARGAN
Defendant:
BLAIR COUNTY and D.A.'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael Robinson v. City of Shamokin, et al
as 23-1612
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SHAMOKIN, NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY, ANTHONY MATULEWICZ, Northymberland County D.A. and others
Defendant:
ANTHONY MATULEWICZ
Nakoski v. Henry et al
as 1:2022cv01984
Plaintiff:
Christopher A. Nakoski
Defendant:
Rebecca Henry, Trooper Cathrine Long, Judge Angela Krom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LoDuca v. Zimmerman et al
as 4:2022cv00166
Plaintiff:
Joseph LoDuca
Defendant:
Trooper Joel Zimmerman, D.A. Michael Piecuch, President Judge Hudock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wassel v. Torbeck et al
as 3:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
Paul J. Wassel, Jr.
Defendant:
Eric Richard Torbeck, Gregory H. Chelak, Raymond J. Tonkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv16454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Caccia v. Wapinski et al
as 3:2021cv01447
Plaintiff:
William A. Caccia, II
Defendant:
Warden David Wapinski, D.A. Michale Opake and William Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevens v. Sullum et al
as 3:2020cv01911
Defendant:
A.D.A. Judy Price, Jessi Sullum, Detective Chris Kolcharno and others
Plaintiff:
John Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01394
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mundis v. Rutters Farm Store Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv01316
Defendant:
State of PA, Northern Regional Police, Northern York County Regional Police and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Earl Mundis
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
