Civil Rights Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Jaye v. United States et al (MAG +) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv05328
Defendant: KNUCKLES, KOMOSINSKI & MANFRO, LLP, BERMAN, SAUTER, RECORD & JARDIM, PC, Kemeny, Ramp & Renaud, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Chris Jaye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. DAUPHIN COUNTY DOMESTICS
as 1:2021cv00236
Plaintiff: Charles E Smith
Defendant: Dauphin County Domestics
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Markle v. Hoffman et al
as 4:2018cv02037
Plaintiff: Joseph R. Markle
Defendant: Police Chief Reynolds, Harry E. Smith and Sgt. Bruce Hoffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv01241
Plaintiff: Charles E. Smith
Defendant: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Swatara Township Police Department and Dauphin County Booking Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv09238
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Leslie Camick v. Christopher Smith, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-2547
Plaintiff - Appellant: LESLIE LYLE CAMICK, AKA Wayne Camick
Defendant: CHRISTOPHER E. SMITH, DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR COWLEY COUNTY KANSAS, IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY, LINDA LOOMIS, ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR COWLEY COUNTY KANSAS, IN HER INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY, NICOLE HILLS, OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF WINFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT IN HER INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00153
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mathis v. Fossett et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00345
Plaintiff: Brenda Mathis
Defendant: Michael Fossett , E. Smith , Jose Vasquez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. Piecuch et al
as 4:2014cv01652
Plaintiff: Joseph E. Smith
Defendant: Michael Piecuch and Michael Hudock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NASH v. SOUTH ORANGE MAPLEWOOD BOARD OF EDUCATION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv03718
Plaintiff: MAURICE NASH
Defendant: SOUTH ORANGE MAPLEWOOD BOARD OF EDUCATION, BRIAN OSBORNE, KIRK E. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?