Cases 1 - 10 of 13
SOROKA v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al
as 2:2024cv02929
Defendant:
OFFICER LYNNEICE HILL, CAPTAIN BRIAN W. HARTZELL, LIEUTENANT JOHN LANDIS and others
Plaintiff:
DIMITRY SOROKA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
KIM v. MOBILIA et al
as 1:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
SARA KIM
Defendant:
NICHOLAS C. MOBILIA, MICHELE S. HARTZELL and NORTH EAST SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
MELVIN et al v. INJUSTICE WATCH NFP
as 2:2021cv03209
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MELVIN, DANIEL FARRELLY, BRION MILLIGAN and others
Defendant:
INJUSTICE WATCH NFP, CITY OF PHILADLEPHIA and INJUSTICE WATCH NFP doing business as THE PLAIN VIEW PROJECT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01873
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
MELVIN et al v. KENNEY et al
as 2:2020cv03529
Plaintiff:
JESUS CRUZ, MICHAEL MELVIN, BRION MILLIGAN and others
Defendant:
HONORABLE JAMES F. KENNEY, LARRY KRASNER, EMILY BAKER-WHITE doing business as THE PLAIN VIEW PROJECT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
SIMMER v. KEHLER, ESQUIRE et al
as 1:2015cv02285
Plaintiff:
KAITLIN SIMMER
Defendant:
FAWN KEHLER, ESQUIRE, BOROUGH OF STONE HARBOR , DANIEL PETERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MCLINDEN v. GING et al
as 2:2014cv00268
Plaintiff:
SEAN MCLINDEN
Defendant:
D. RYAN GING, HARTZELL, SALBAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPINA v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2012cv00408
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY SPINA
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and BRIAN W. HARTZELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
