Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00490
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Kevin Potter, et al v. David Newkirk, et al
as 23-2625
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN POTTER and MARGUERITE POTTER
Defendant:
DAVID NEWKIRK, ROBERT ROBBINS, JOSE RODRIGUEZ and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY SHERRIFS DEPARTMENT NEW JERSEY, PROSECUTOR CUMBERLAND COUNTY, JON REILLY and others
Antoine Poteat v. Gerald Lydon, et al
as 22-2114
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTOINE POTEAT
Defendant / Appellee:
GERALD LYDON, Individually and Official Capacity of Pennsylvania State Police, CHAD LABOUR, Individually and Official Capacity of Pennsylavnia State Police, NICHOLAS GOLDSMITH, Individually and Official Capacity of Pennsylvania State Police and others
Martin v. FCA US LLC
as 1:2022cv00659
Plaintiff:
James Martin
Defendant:
FCA US LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
POTTER et al v. NEWKIRK et al
as 1:2017cv08478
Plaintiff:
KEVIN POTTER and MARGUERITE POTTER
Defendant:
DAVID NEWKIRK, ROBERT ROBBINS, JOSE RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander Introcaso v. Kevin Curry
as 08-3431
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALEXANDER M. INTROCASO
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN B. CURRY, PATRICK L. MEEHAN, SETH WEBER and others
INTROCASO v. MEEHAN et al
as 2:2007cv03726
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER M. INTROCASO
Defendant:
PATRICK L. MEEHAN, PATRICK L. MEEHAN, SETH WEBER and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Alexander Introcaso v. Thomas Benni
as 08-1318
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALEXANDER M. INTROCASO
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS J. BENNIS, JAMES T. SPANG, JR., JAMES M. POLYAK and others
Alexander Introcaso v. Thomas Bennis
as 08-1318
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALEXANDER M. INTROCASO
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS J. BENNIS, JAMES T. SPANG, JR., JAMES M. POLYAK and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
