Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01316
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv08817
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Lin v. Skotleski et al
as 3:2024cv01157
Defendant:
William Skotleski, Brian Konopka, Anthony Doblovasky and others
Plaintiff:
Li Zhuo Lin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04604
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
Antwyne Whaley v. Superintendent Philadelphia School District, et al
as 23-3158
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTWYNE WHALEY
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT PHILADELPHIA SCHOOL DISTRICT, PHILADELPHIA SCHOOL DISTRICT, LEWIS ELKINS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL and others
Ryan Dean v. J. Bissell, et al
as 23-2741
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RYAN DEAN
Defendant / Appellee:
J. BISSELL, IMMIGRATION CONSULTANTS OF CANADA REGULATORY COUNCIL, ATKINS and others
Defendant:
ABC CORP 1-100, BALBIRAN, P. C. and others
WHALEY v. WATTLINGTON et al
as 2:2023cv01344
Plaintiff:
ANTWYNE WHALEY
Defendant:
TONY B. WATTLINGTON, PHILADELPHIA SCHOOL DISTRICT, LEWIS ELKINS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LIANG v. YAN et al
as 2:2022cv01763
Plaintiff:
GUANJAN LIANG
Defendant:
LI MENG YAN and DOES 1-50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
DEAN v. J. BISSELL et al
as 2:2021cv09770
Defendant:
BELL JR., TOWNSHIP OF CEDAR GROVE, JOZSA and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN DEAN
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
