Cases 1 - 10 of 30
James Pepper v. Attorney General Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-1261
Plaintiff:
JAMES PEPPER
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY BUCKS COUNTY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04776
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv07408
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
RODWELL et al v. BARAKA et al
as 2:2022cv06427
Plaintiff:
MONIQUE RODWELL, BRANDEN RODWELL, JAYKIL RODWELL and others
Defendant:
RAS BARAKA, BRIAN OHARA, AMIRI BARAKA, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01416
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv13471
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00015
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
PORTOGALLO PEPPERS, LLC v. JONES et al
as 2:2020cv01940
Defendant:
MAYOR CHARDAE JONES and BOROUGH OF BRADDOCK
Plaintiff:
PORTOGALLO PEPPERS, LLC doing business as PORTOGALLO PEPPERS NAT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
