Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Urve Maggitti v. Bret Binder, et al
as 24-1169
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
BRET M. BINDER, DEBRA RYAN, DANIEL E. ROLAND and others
Urve Maggitti v. Bret Binder, et al
as 23-3277
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
BRET M. BINDER, DEBRA RYAN, DANIEL E. ROLAND and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Elad v. Truist Bank et al
as 1:2023cv01360
Plaintiff:
Joseph B. Elad
Defendant:
Truist Bank, Joshua Collins, Ballard Spahr LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MAGGITTI v. HON. BRET M. BINDER et al
as 2:2023cv02273
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
HON. BRET M. BINDER, HON. ANTHONY T. VERWEY, HON. WILLIAM P. MAHON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02996
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Marta Jo Stampone, et al v. Brittian Amann, et al
as 23-1617
Plaintiff:
MARTA JO STAMPONE, Formerly known as Hieshetter
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FREDERICK STAMPONE
Defendant / Appellee:
BRITTIAN AMANN, BENJAMIN AMANN, GRAND RAPIDS FOAM TECHNOLOGIES and others
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, PAUL L. MALONEY, ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM BARR and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04703
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
SLOANE v. BLACK
as 2:2022cv04657
Plaintiff:
Novice Sloane
Defendant:
RACHEL BLACK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
REYELT et al v. MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING
as 2:2022cv06072
Plaintiff:
VICTORIA REYELT and MICHELLE OLIVERI
Defendant:
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
