Cases 1 - 10 of 109
SHAW v. MARKS et al
as 2:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
ARIES SHAW
Defendant:
AARON M. MARKS, JOEY D BRANT, CORPORAL MARIACHER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Norman Shaw, Jr. v. Wayne Memorial Hospital
as 24-1522
Plaintiff:
NORMAN SHAW, JR.
Defendant:
WAYNE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
KILLORAN SHAW v. PARAMOUNT STAFFING, INC et al
as 3:2024cv01134
Defendant:
PARAMOUNT STAFFING, INC, NULOOM, Proman Staffing and others
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL GRACE KILLORAN SHAW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
KAETZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv21368
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM F. KAETZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, JUDGE CLARENCE THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
SHAW v. ZEE et al
as 1:2023cv21068
Plaintiff:
ALLISON M. SHAW
Defendant:
TROOPER DOUGLAS ZEE, TROOPER BERNARD TENNANT, TROOPER KENNETH LANGEFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
William Kaetz v. USA, et al
as 23-1880
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM F. KAETZ
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, EDUCATIONAL CREDIT MANAGEMENT CORP and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01589
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
