Cases 1 - 10 of 140
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00897
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Urve Maggitti v. Bret Binder, et al
as 24-1169
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
BRET M. BINDER, DEBRA RYAN, DANIEL E. ROLAND and others
Urve Maggitti v. Bret Binder, et al
as 23-3277
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
BRET M. BINDER, DEBRA RYAN, DANIEL E. ROLAND and others
HAGGAINS v. SMITH et al
as 2:2023cv04945
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN L. HAGGAINS
Defendant:
KENNETH W. SMITH and SUZANNE K. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
ZIELANSKI v. BUCKS COUNTY CHILDREN & YOUTH SOCIAL SERVICES AGENCY et al
as 2:2023cv03847
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ZIELANSKI
Defendant:
BUCKS COUNTY CHILDREN & YOUTH SOCIAL SERVICES AGENCY, MARJORIE MCKEONE, CHRISTOPHER DOHENY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kevin Potter, et al v. David Newkirk, et al
as 23-2625
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN POTTER and MARGUERITE POTTER
Defendant:
DAVID NEWKIRK, ROBERT ROBBINS, JOSE RODRIGUEZ and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY SHERRIFS DEPARTMENT NEW JERSEY, PROSECUTOR CUMBERLAND COUNTY, JON REILLY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
MALEK v. DUFFY et al
as 2:2023cv04344
Defendant:
SAFE HORIZON, CORPORATION COUNSEL, MATTHEW DUFFY and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MALEK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MAGGITTI v. HON. BRET M. BINDER et al
as 2:2023cv02273
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
HON. BRET M. BINDER, HON. ANTHONY T. VERWEY, HON. WILLIAM P. MAHON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
