Cases 1 - 10 of 3,224
Thomas v. NORDO et al
as 2:2024cv04914
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DETECTIVE TRACY BYARD, DETECTIVE BILLY GOLPHIN and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
MCLAURIN v. RUBINO et al
as 2:2024cv09237
Defendant:
CUCCHIARA, CALQUHOUN, DEPINTO and others
Plaintiff:
LEROY MCLAURIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv08866
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Alexander et al
as 5:2024cv04568
Plaintiff:
Lapreciouse Catlett, Shanae Butler, Brenna Cherry and others
Defendant:
SEAWORLD PARKS & ENTERTAINMENT, INC. doing business as SESAME PLACE PHILADELPHIA and SEAWORLD PARKS & ENTERTAINMENT LLC doing business as SESAME PLACE PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
BRYCELAND v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK et al
as 2:2024cv08779
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, THOMAS GUT, OFFICER JAMES BURNS and others
Plaintiff:
MARTA BRYCELAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00199
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SMITH v. THOMAS-STREET et al
as 2:2024cv04215
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER DENARDO, CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES LLC, DAMARIS GARCIA and others
Plaintiff:
DENIYA NAKEIDRA SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harinder Singh v. Thomas Droppa, et al
as 24-2479
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, THOMAS DROPPA, GLENN LAURITSEN and others
Plaintiff:
HARINDER SINGH
KREIS v. SMITH
as 5:2024cv03686
Plaintiff:
AUGUST BYRON KREIS, IV
Defendant:
OFFICER THOMAS SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION v. SEVER
as 3:2024cv08273
Defendant:
THOMAS F. SEVER
Plaintiff:
PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
