Cases 1 - 10 of 398
Marianne Sawicki v. Michael Kipphan, et al
as 24-2120
Plaintiff:
MARIANNE SAWICKI
Defendant:
MICHAEL M. KIPPHAN, LORI HEATON, RICHARD A. WILSON and others
JOHNSON v. 1011778 B.C. UNLIMITED LIABILTY COMPANY et al
as 3:2024cv06914
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant:
1011778 B.C. UNLIMITED LIABILTY COMPANY, 1019334 B.C. UNLIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, BURGER KING CANADA HOLDING INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Marianne Sawicki v. Michael Kipphan, et al
as 24-2033
Plaintiff:
MARIANNE SAWICKI
Defendant:
MICHAEL M. KIPPHAN, LORI HEATON, RICHARD A. WILSON and others
Johnson v. Carrols Corp et al
as 3:2024cv00875
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Carrols Corp, Restaurant Brand International Inc., Burger King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00884
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00885
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1701
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00968
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
THOMAS JR. v. BUMB et al
as 3:2024cv01046
Plaintiff:
FRED THOMAS JR.
Defendant:
CHIEF JUDGE RENEE M. BUMB, MAGISTRATE JUDGE SHARON A. KING and MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH A. PASCAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
