Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01535
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv17373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
POLLOCK et al v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE et al
as 2:2019cv00964
Plaintiff:
SHERI POLLOCK and DANNY WILLARD POLLOCK
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, TROOPER MATTHEW KEPHART, CORPORAL GREGORY BOGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv03116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jeanne Zaloga, et al v. Borough of Moosic, et al
as 15-2723
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JEANNE ZALOGA, EDWARD ZALOGA, D.O., C.P.A. and CORRECTIONAL CARE INC
Defendant - Appellee:
BOROUGH OF MOOSIC, MOOSIC BOROUGH COUNCIL, MOOSIC BOROUGH PLANNING COMMISSION and others
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSEPH MERCATILI, Individually and in his official capacityas President of Moosic Borough Council
ARISTEO v. RAINES et al
as 1:2015cv04115
Plaintiff:
BRUCE ARISTEO
Defendant:
JODY RAINES, WEBMARCOM LLC, MICHELE MOKEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARISTEO v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2015cv00769
Plaintiff:
BRUCE ARISTEO
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY OFFICE OF THE PROSECUTOR, JODY RAINES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv03864
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
CRAWFORD v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv02626
Plaintiff:
WILLARD CRAWFORD
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LICIARDELLO and PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICERS DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
