Cases 1 - 10 of 329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01746
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
COVINGTON v. PLYMOUTH TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2024cv01571
Plaintiff:
ROXANNE COVINGTON
Defendant:
PLYMOUTH TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT and POLICE OFFICER DOUGLAS WELLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00510
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
DILLARD v. WELLS FARGO BANK et al
as 2:2024cv04146
Plaintiff:
DERECK DILLARD
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK and CHASE BANK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3141
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
VITALITY ORGANICS LLC et al v. LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2023cv04655
Plaintiff:
VITALITY ORGANICS LLC, RJR WELLNESS LLC and NATURAL HEALING AND WELLNESS : OF CRANBERRY LLC,
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, HEATHER L. ADAMS, JEFFREY R. KRAUSE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv04035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
