Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Kevin Potter, et al v. David Newkirk, et al
as 23-2625
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN POTTER and MARGUERITE POTTER
Defendant:
DAVID NEWKIRK, ROBERT ROBBINS, JOSE RODRIGUEZ and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY SHERRIFS DEPARTMENT NEW JERSEY, PROSECUTOR CUMBERLAND COUNTY, JON REILLY and others
BROCK v. CITY OF LANCASTER et al
as 5:2023cv03202
Plaintiff:
CYRENA BROCK
Defendant:
CITY OF LANCASTER, SERGEANTS/LIEUTENANTS JOHN DOE 1-10 and POLICE OFFICERS JOHN DOE 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
KING, JR. v. BROCK & SCOTT, PLLC et al
as 2:2022cv04981
Plaintiff:
JERRY L. KING, JR.
Defendant:
BROCK & SCOTT, PLLC, MICHAEL BROCK, JASON BRANHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KING, JR. v. BROCK & SCOTT, PLLC et al
as 1:2022cv04981
Plaintiff:
JERRY L. KING, JR.
Defendant:
BROCK & SCOTT, PLLC, MICHAEL BROCK, JASON BRANHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01789
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01791
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
TORO et al v. DONOHUE et al
as 2:2021cv17248
Plaintiff:
YANILDA A. TORO and YANISA D. QUINONES
Defendant:
JUDGE DONOHUE, JUDGE BROCK, OFFICER GEORGE ALLARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv13495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00689
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
