Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00592
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
DEAN v. J. BISSELL et al
as 2:2021cv09770
Defendant:
BELL JR., TOWNSHIP OF CEDAR GROVE, JOZSA and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN DEAN
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Williams v. Black et al
as 3:2020cv00465
Defendant:
The Commonwealth, Sandy Blosser and Brandon P. Black
Plaintiff:
Sanford Williams, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANFORD-EL v. MONGALIERI et al
as 3:2019cv08776
Defendant:
SPERO KALAMBAKAS, FRANK MONGALIERI, BARBARA NYITRAI and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLEMAGNE-BINYAMIN SANFORD-EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
KITCHELL v. BECKER et al
as 1:2019cv06596
Defendant:
KARLEE MARTIN, NAN FAMULAR, SANFORD BECKER and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT KITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRINCE v. REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE et al
as 1:2019cv00523
Defendant:
ALL SATELLITE ORGANIZATIONS, DE FACTO IMPLEMATION OF LAW and REPUBLICAN AA NATIONAL COMMITT
Plaintiff:
DARRELL SANFORD PRINCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRINCE v. DE FACTO IMPLEMATION OF LAW et al
as 2:2019cv00063
Defendant:
ALL SATELLITE ORGANIZATIONS, DE FACTO IMPLEMATION OF LAW, REPUBLICAN AA NATIONAL COMMITT and others
Plaintiff:
DARRELL SANFORD PRINCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Darrell Prince v. Mitch McConnell, et al
as 17-2951
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL SANFORD PRINCE
Defendant - Appellee:
MITCH MCCONNELL, OFFICE OF PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES and PAUL RYAN, SPEAKER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
