Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 91 - 100 of 85,392
Jamal Ali v. District Attorney Philadelphia, et al
as 24-2000
Plaintiff: JAMAL ALI
Defendant: DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI
Vernon Robinson v. Warden Fort Dix FCI, et al
as 24-1999
Plaintiff: VERNON ROBINSON
Defendant: WARDEN FORT DIX FCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY LYCOMING COUNTY
MILLER v. JOHN DOE et al
as 2:2024cv06627
Petitioner: WOODROW MILLER, III
Respondent: JOHN DOE, GOV. N.J. and BECKY SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SANTIAGO v. WARDEN FCI LORETTO
as 3:2024cv00120
Petitioner: ALEXANDER JESUS SANTIAGO
Respondent: WARDEN FCI LORETTO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Johnson v. Boose et al
as 1:2024cv00890
Plaintiff: Raheem Johnson
Defendant: Boose, CAPTAIN Baptiste, GRIEVANCE COUNSELOR Heist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bolduc v. Arviza
as 1:2024cv00892
Petitioner: Jason Donald Bolduc
Respondent: M. Arviza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BUTLER v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2024cv06549
Petitioner: AHMAR BUTLER
Respondent: BRUCE DAVIS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06524
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
WILLIAMS v. HUTTON et al
as 1:2024cv06563
Plaintiff: JOHN L. WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant: PTL. WILLIAM HUTTON, PTL. S. O'HALLORAN, B. FIDUCIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Jonathan Baker
as 24-2002
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JONATHAN P. BAKER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?