Cases 151 - 160 of 85,189
Richard Weber v. County of Erie, et al
as 24-1477
Plaintiff:
RICHARD EDWARD WEBER
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ERIE, ERIE COUNTY PRISON, WARDEN BRYANT and others
Kaitlyn Cooper Youmans v. Warden SCI Muncy, et al
as 24-1859
Plaintiff:
KAITLYN COOPER YOUMANS
Defendant:
WARDEN SCI MUNCY and OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Smith-Egizio v. Rivello et al
as 1:2024cv00767
Petitioner:
Tyler Smith-Egizio
Respondent:
Superintendent J. Rivello, Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and PA Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hinshaw v. Moore et al
as 1:2024cv00769
Plaintiff:
Jason Dewight Hinshaw
Defendant:
Keri L. Moore, John Rivello, John Kohler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATKINS v. SUPERINTENDENT RIVELLO et al
as 5:2024cv01942
Petitioner:
LEWIS T. WATKINS
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT RIVELLO, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TALBERT v. IRWIN et al
as 1:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
RANDY IRWIN, JOHN BLICHA, IAN GUSTAFSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Burton v. Crawford et al
as 4:2024cv00761
Plaintiff:
Dante Burton
Defendant:
C.O. Crawford, C.O. Cebrick, Unit Manager Grohowski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
ALWARD v. ELKTON FSL et al
as 2:2024cv01888
Petitioner:
MATTHEW KEITH ALWARD
Respondent:
ELKTON FSL and BRIAN NEWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
ROSARIO v. LOVERA et al
as 5:2024cv01924
Plaintiff:
JOVAN ROSARIO
Defendant:
JERAMY LOVERA, OFFICER BEST, SARGENT NAME UNKNOWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
