Cases 11 - 20 of 2,175
ALLEN v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2024cv00323
Plaintiff:
JULIUS ALLEN
Defendant:
U/K JOHNSON CORRECTIONAL OFFICER, U/K ARNOLD LIEUTENANT, U/K VANDIVNER CORRECTIONAL OFFICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. BULLOCK et al
as 1:2024cv01450
Plaintiff:
LAQUAN E. JOHNSON
Defendant:
K. BULLOCK, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and F.B.O.P.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aquil Johnson v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 24-1371
Plaintiff:
AQUIL JOHNSON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Scott, Jr. v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00335
Plaintiff:
Earnest Scott, Jr.
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Laurel R. Harry, John Rivello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ACUNA-VIALES v. PASQUALE et al
as 3:2024cv01048
Plaintiff:
EDGAR ACUNA-VIALES
Defendant:
TIMOTHY PASQUALE, HOSPITAL ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON, SOMERSET COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marcellus Jones v. Robert Gilmore, et al
as 24-1307
Plaintiff:
MARCELLUS A. JONES
Defendant:
ROBERT GILMORE, DENISE SMITH, JAMES BRESHAHN and others
JOHNSON v. CHARLES
as 2:2024cv00956
Plaintiff:
MARK JOHNSON
Defendant:
WARDEN RON CHARLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armoni Johnson v. Bienkoski, et al
as 24-1276
Plaintiff:
ARMONI MASUD JOHNSON
Defendant:
SGT. BIENKOSKI, Dallas State Prison Staff Member, OFFICER CHUBA, Dallas State Prison Staff, ADA, Teacher Aid and others
GAY v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2024cv00825
Petitioner:
MAURICE GAY
Respondent:
BRUCE DAVIS, MAJOR C. SEARS, MS. JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nedrick Johnson v. Warden Allenwood FCI Low
as 24-1257
Plaintiff:
NEDRICK LAMONT JOHNSON
Defendant:
WARDEN ALLENWOOD FCI LOW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
